Globalisation is the combination of
different ideas, media and other cultural products from all over the world,
resulting in an international community. This melting pot of cultures brings
along connectedness of societies, mainly due to new media such as social
networks, international productions or internet corporations. The effect
globalisation has on the everyday life and thus on humankind, can be seen in
various sectors. However, as my field of interest is the media, I will
concentrate on how globalisation changed not only journalism, but also new
media in general, and in how far the latter itself is relevant to global
movements, socially, economically or politically.
As
people became aware of multiculturalism and adapted to the process of globalisation,
media had to do the same. One can say, that media plays an important role in globalisation’s
rapid growth. Due to new media, information can be gathered quickly on search
engines, emotions can be shared on social networks, friends can be made in virtual
worlds and international entertainment can be downloaded in seconds. It seems
that through new media and globalisation, time, space and reality are fading.
Before
the 1970s media systems were predominantly national, with globalisation
however, western media systems went through an immense transformation, trying
to serve not only the local, but appeal to people on a global scale. It is true
that when it comes to journalism, people trust in local and known sources;
people read newspapers they have grown up with, watch channels they are used to
and have a look at blogs that friends have recommended. Still, there are more
stories than ever coming from the outside of one’s community, news travel fast
through new media and information is only a mouse click away. More than ever,
do American movies, shows and music attract a large public. As one can watch
international entertainment easily and for free on the internet, the interest
in local media productions often decreases and authenticity turns into one big
culture, the western culture (Tunstall 1977). One could argue that cultural
imperialism installed itself in the world, cultural products and values are
flowing ‘from the West to the rest’, due to not only economic power but mainly
the use of media. Hence, globalisation is to be made accountable for the rise
of mass media taking control over global culture and communication. This
westernization is often related to the loss of diversity in nowadays’
communities, as people get used to cultural synchronization through new media,
imposing only one way of life to all societies. An example for this is
‘McDonaldization, Ritzer argues that the food chain is one of ‘the most
influential developments of the 20th century’, it can be found in nearly
all parts of the world whether in form of the original restaurant or of a clone
restaurant. In either way wherever one goes on holidays, one can be sure to
find the same kind of food he knows from home as McDonalds gave the base for
all fast food chains, and explains the idea of what globalisation represents.
People do not have to experience other cultures anymore, they can continue
their way of living wherever they happen to be in the world. This is what
globalisation is about and what humans expect since its progress: efficiency,
calculability and predictability.
Globalisation is as one can see the
consequence of modernity, and plays not only an important role in media itself
but also in social life and is thus related to new media. With the rise of
social networks, the notion of community changed and the term virtual community
gained in importance. The global network communication defies the importance of
time and space as in the online world social relations across the globe are
possible and identities can be mixed. In social networks one can create himself
a new identity and find a community which fits one’s own interests and values.
This has its positive sides, it can however, also be damaging to the users
themselves or to how they see reality.
New media allow users to be connected and
interactive at all times, it changes the way one sees and experiences the
world, but furthermore it pushes globalisation to extend. Private and public
spheres are mixing; people believe that representing themselves in social media
is a normal thing to do, which has an impact on how people perceive their real
life next to their virtual one.
All in all, globalisation made the world a
more connected place, giving people the ability to interact and economy the
chance to grow. However, one must not forget that it also erased cultural
aspects and encourages homogeneity. In order to appreciate the global market,
one must critically analyse point of views, relate it to reality and not reduce
the whole world to the image which is most portrayed in media.
References:
Flew, T. (2008). New Media an
introduction, 3rd edition. Victoria: Oxford University Press.
McQuail, D. (2011) Mass Communication Theory, 6th edition. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Landow, G. (2006) Hypertext 3.0: Critical Theory and New Media in an Era of Globalization. USA: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hardy, J. (2008) Western Media Systems. Oxon: Routledge.
Tunstall, J. (1977) The Media were American: U.S. Mass Media in Decline. Retrieved from the lecture of How Media Changed the World by Bastow, S. London: Kingston University.
Bastow, S. (2013) How Media Changed the World II: Lecutre. London: Kingston University.
Ritzer, G. (1998) The McDonaldization Thesis: Exploration and Extensions. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Brand, J. (2013) Digital Media and Society: Week 11 Lecture. Gold Coast: Bond University.

No comments:
Post a Comment